Monday, June 15, 2009

Glenn Beck: Stop Denying Facts from the Bible!

Listening to the show, one can often hear Glenn, who many know is one of my biggest radio inspirations, will deny the roll of the Bilderberg Conferences in the NWO. Some believe he is part of the conspiracy from the Central Banks, the Tri-Lateral commission, and other Cloak and Dagger organizations that used to be unspeakable but are now, on their own, coming to the light. Recently said by the Bilderbergs:

"To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn't go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing." -Denis Healey
So if they themselves are admitting to an NWO agenda, why do radio hosts such as Glenn Beck continue to deny their roll? It's a major button. Glenn "GOMP"s anyone who even mentions the possibility.

But really, who are the ones who label ideas of end time events unfolding "conspiracy theorists" who are all a bunch of 19 year olds who play Warcraft, Duke Nukem, or whatever the current flavor of the month is in PC Gaming? The conspirators.

Walking Dead Radio, in it's most recent show, has uncovered enough factual data, all publicly available, including Wikipedia sources, that connect the dots between Biblical Prophecy, The Bilderbergs, and The Central Bank making the Bible read less like "Prophecy" and more like Play-By-Play commentary.

So Glenn, Vince Wylde asks, what is your real issue? Is it your overwhelming, and obvious fear of End Time events unfolding? Glenn has done shows on End Times and always says the same thing:

"I don't think I'm ready for this man, let it happen to someone else later in history!"

It's apparent, Glenn, that you've already connected the dots yourself. Your denial of the possibility isn't going to change God's mind. "Oh, wait. Glenn's not ready."

Glenn, I am a big fan. I don't believe you are one of the conspirators. I believe you are a recovering Alcoholic Top 40 DJ. You know, a farmer. I do believe your denial that the King has mounted his horse is blinding you to signs now allowing themselves into the light because the people are becoming accepting of their agenda.

Read more...

Obama Encourages Israel to "Divide The Land"

For those of you keen on your End Time Prophecy, this one comes out of Joel 3:

1-3 "In those days, yes, at that very time when I put life back together again for Judah and Jerusalem,
I'll assemble all the godless nations.
I'll lead them down into Judgment Valley
And put them all on trial, and judge them one and all
because of their treatment of my own people Israel.
They scattered my people all over the pagan world
and grabbed my land for themselves.
They threw dice for my people
and used them for barter.
They would trade a boy for a whore,
sell a girl for a bottle of wine when they wanted a drink.


Read more...

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Poll: Is THIS The Dawn of The NWO or Just A Gaming System

The New XBox "Project Natal" boasts a clever 2 way camera system with broadband abilities and real time interaction, Star Trek style, for communication with other users making even the cell phone antiquated. Is this just a gaming system? Or a clever way to get citizens to willingly Lo-Jack themselves into the coming NWO? Vote below.







Read more...

Thursday, May 28, 2009

The Obama Deception

Read more...

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Prop 8: Can It Be Challenged?

No. The people were asked to vote, they made their opinion. However, Hollywood and other far left Socialist / Activists think they can tell the voting majority where to go and what to do when they get there.

LA Times:

The California Supreme Court failed to protect gay couples' fundamental right to marry when it upheld Proposition 8, forcing same-sex couples to appeal to the federal courts to remedy the injustice, two prominent lawyers said today in announcing a lawsuit on behalf of two gay couples.

Former U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson, a renowned conservative, and David Boies, who opposed Olson in Bush v. Gore in the 2000 fight over the presidential election, cast their collaborative effort to restore the right of gays to marry in California as a moral imperative to correct an injustice. Their suit seeks an immediate injunction on Prop. 8's ban, thereby allowing same-sex marriages to resume while the case makes its way through the federal court system.


So, are we finally here? The "people" make a decision with a vote and some politicians strong-arm their way through the crowd and attempt to over-throw the voter's will? This publication would feel the same way were the shoe on the other foot. Not to mention if it were on the other foot, Lefties would be up-in-arms over someone trying to overturn this vote in the other direction, but, pay no attention to that man behind the curtain....

Theodore Wilson is what is known as a RINO. Republican In Name Only. In classic warfare style, the opposite camp infiltrates the other side as a spy or a special op who's only mission is to derail the party line. They hold none of the opposite camp's values. It's a ruse.

What is particularly bothersome here is the blase mentality. "We can just tell these people to go to hell with their mindless vote. Their will means nothing." The left can deny this all day long, quote hundreds of pre-scripted talking points, but the truth remains, it is what it is. Period. Socialism overtaking our freedom and sucking the life out of America.

Read more...

Texting Ban - Safety Or Another Power Grab?

Mass. Senate votes to ban texting while driving

May 22, 2009

By David Abel, Globe Staff

The state Senate has dropped its longstanding opposition to a ban on texting while driving, laying the groundwork for a prohibition in Massachusetts after several tragedies caused by distracted drivers.

After years of tabling similar bills, the state Senate voted for a budget amendment late Thursday night that would ban either writing or reading text messages while behind the wheel.


One has to ask if this is really about safety. Since this same state has tried twice - unsucessfully - to require helmets while kids are sledding, it would seem this is more a clear message that the powers that be have enough influence and power to make any law regarding anything they so choose. Conveniently, these laws seem to usually involve "personally responsible behavior". I'm sure the Conservative Wing would argue the same way about items such as abortion and gay marriage, however this invasion of personal responsibility only appears to swing one way: When it gives government authority and a little more power to reach further into our personal lives and control our private behavior.

Text while driving, along with seat belt laws and helmet laws, is not the government's playing field. Americans need to be free to make careless decisions and it should not affect anyone one way or another. If they wear the helmet, it should not be because someone told them to. Likewise, if they don't wear the helmet, crash, and end up a road pizza, no one should be allowed to sue and the responsibility should fall on family members to clean up the mess, so to speak.

The more power you allow these people, the less freedom you will have to make personal decisions regarding your own life.

Read more...

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

1 Million Envelopes Bombard The Capital

By Drew Zahn
© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Over one million, empty, red envelopes have poured into the White House mail room, symbolizing the empty promise of lives snuffed out in abortion; and with Red Envelope Day planned for tomorrow, coordinators estimate that number could more than double.

The Red Envelope Project is an idea sparked in the mind and prayers of a Massachusetts man, Christ Otto, who envisioned in January thousands of red envelopes sent to the White House, a visual expression of moral outrage over the president's position on abortion.

On the backs of the envelopes, senders write a message Otto composed: "This envelope represents one child who died in abortion. It is empty because that life was unable to offer anything to the world. Responsibility begins with conception."


The surrounding of TRUE Nazi America begins. One of many expressions of Middle America being unleashed on the President who has broken most, if not all, of his campaign promises. America has chosen to let those who are paid servants of the people and our will know that we out number them and their visions and ideas of imprisoning freedom and gaining power will not go unchallenged. These people are not democrats, they are Socialists, much like Hitler... Just because millions are not in concentration camps does not mean there is no comparison.

It doesn't end there, after viewing the following video, ask yourself, is another American Revolution on the brink?



Read more...

The Socialist Hypocrisy (Video)

The only thing consistent with the left wing is their ability to simply not care, nor enforce one law that may turn on themselves, even if they wrote the laws themselves.


Read more...

The Nationalization of Our Nation's Business. GMC CEO Fired by Obama

Source: The Heritage Foundation

Last night, the CEO of General Motors, Rick Wagoner, was fired by the President of the United States. Perhaps not “fired” in the strict legal sense – if legalities matter anymore – but certainly fired for all effective purposes. In a statement by Wagoner released last night, the now-former CEO states specifically that Administration officials “requested that I “step aside”’ as CEO of GM.” “And so I have,” he said. No pretense of an agonized decision, no pretending that the board asked him to go, simply that the White House asked him to go and he left.
It’s hard to feel sorry for Mr. Wagoner. Not only did he lead GM into economic ruin, but he led the charge to Washington, D.C. for handouts, costing taxpayers billions, and – perhaps worse – inviting political control over the former industrial giant. The real concern is not that Wagoner was fired, but that he was fired by the White House and not a bankruptcy judge.

And despite President Obama’s statement today that “the federal government has no interest in running GM” that is exactly what it is doing, with every strategic decision being reviewed from Washington. Chrysler is equally under Washington’s thumb – being instructed this week to finalize a pending strategic alliance with Fiat.

The question isn’t whether Washington will run the auto companies, but for how long. And on this front, there is potentially some good news: bankruptcy – which would provide a politician-free process for enabling (and forcing) GM and Chrysler to restructure, is being actively considered by the Administration, with the president himself today implying that the two firms may need to use “our bankruptcy code as a mechanism to help them restructure quickly and emerge stronger.”

He’s right – and is right to put bankruptcy squarely on the table. But, at the same time, he promised GM an additional 60 days in taxpayer funding, extending once again the “deadline” for action. This cast doubt on whether the Administration has the political will – now, in 60 days, or ever – to press the bankruptcy button.

No matter how many CEOs are fired; bankruptcy is the real question facing President Obama. The future of a privately-run automobile industry may depend on the answer.
It would seem the comparison of America copying the ideals set forth by 1940 Germany is not so crazy. The nationalization of business is certainly one major step that duplicates Hitler's mission to seek out those who had crippled his economy, seize the functions of said company, and then point the blame and watch the citizens riot, set fires, and level the founders of these industries. In that time, the target was the Jewish populace.

As of late, targets of Barack Obama have been businesses such as AIG, run by wealthy CEOs with private Jets elaborate houses, earnings and the like. The question is, will this remain the focus of his quiet agression? Or is his ultimate target more elaborate and even darker? Only time can tell...

Read more...

Monday, March 30, 2009

It Happened In 1940 Germany - Socialism

It happened in 1940. The economy was in ruins in Germany. Hitler Bought Companies by the dozens, then pointed his finger at the Jewish people, just as now in America with AIG. The people turned on the Jews and Hitler imprisoned them. It's called Socialism. And it's come to America.



Read more...

Monday, June 09, 2008

The More Things Change, The More They Stay The Same

Did Bush lie? Who knows. Really, who cares.

Think about it. At the end of a day's debate, where we re-hash this issue for the billionth time, what gets accomplished? No hungry get fed.... No lost get found, no prisoners get witnessed to... And yet, people debate this kind of garbage over and over as if we are going to get anywhere or accomplish anything new.

Seriously, remember 8 years ago? We were trying to impeach Clinton (which people seemed to have forgotten) because he got his rocks off in the oval office with an intern. 8 years later, you'd have thought the guy walked on water. We almost nominated his wife as a presidential candidate.

This term, people wanted Bush impeached for lying (same group of blow hards, by the way, mark my words).

What we've not looked at is how stuck on stupid we are in this country. For some 200 years, we've voted like this:

Left
Right
Left
Right
Left
Right

Like in marked step, being marched straight to solitary confinement.

But check this out, we weren't always a strictly two party system. Here's the choices we had and took years ago near the birth of our Nation.

Federalists:

The Federalist Party (or Federal Party) was an American political party in the period 1792 to 1816, with remnants lasting into the 1820s. The Federalists controlled the federal government until 1801. The party was formed by Alexander Hamilton, who, during George Washington's first term, built a network of supporters, largely urban, to support his fiscal policies. These supporters grew into the Federalist Party, which wanted a fiscally sound and strong nationalistic government and was opposed by the Democratic-Republicans.

Democratic-Republicans:

The Democratic-Republican Party was founded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1792. It became the dominant political party until the 1820s, when it split into competing factions, one of which became the modern-day Democratic Party. Its members identified the party as the Republicans, Jeffersonians, Democrats,[1] or combinations of these (Jeffersonian Republicans, etc.).[2]

Jefferson and Madison created the party in order to oppose the economic and foreign policies of the Federalists, a party created a year or so earlier by Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton. Foreign policy issues were central; the party opposed the Jay Treaty of 1794 with Britain (then at war with France) and supported good relations with France before 1801. The party insisted on a strict construction of the Constitution, and denounced many of Hamilton's proposals (especially the national bank) as unconstitutional.[citation needed] The party promoted states' rights and the primacy of the yeoman farmer over bankers, industrialists, merchants, and other monied interests. From 1792 to 1816 the party opposed such Federalist policies as high tariffs, a navy, military spending, a national debt, and a national bank. After the military defeats of the War of 1812, however, the party split on these issues. Many younger party leaders, notably Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams and John C. Calhoun, became nationalists and wanted to build a strong national defense.[3] Meanwhile, the "Old Republican" faction led by John Randolph of Roanoke, William H. Crawford and Nathaniel Macon continued to oppose these policies. By 1828, the Old Republicans were supporting Andrew Jackson against Clay and Adams.

The Whig Party:

The Whig Party was a political party of the United States during the era of Jacksonian democracy. Considered integral to the Second Party System and operating from 1833 to 1856,[1] the party was formed in opposition to the policies of President Andrew Jackson and the Democratic Party. In particular, the Whigs supported the supremacy of Congress over the Executive Branch and favored a program of modernization and economic protectionism. Their name was chosen to echo the American Whigs of 1776, who fought for independence, and because "Whig" was then a widely recognized label of choice for people who saw themselves as opposing autocratic rule.[2] The Whig Party counted among its members such national political luminaries as Daniel Webster, William Henry Harrison, and their preeminent leader, Henry Clay of Kentucky. In addition to Harrison, the Whig Party also counted four war heroes among its ranks, including Generals Zachary Taylor and Winfield Scott. Abraham Lincoln was a Whig leader in frontier Illinois.

In its over two decades of existence, the Whig Party saw two of its candidates, Harrison and Taylor, elected President of the United States. Both, however, died in office. John Tyler became president after Harrison's death, but was expelled from the party, and Millard Fillmore, who became president after Taylor's death, was the last Whig to hold the nation's highest office.

The National Union Party:

The National Union Party was a political party in the United States from 1864 to 1868. It was an alliance between members of the Republican Party who backed incumbent President Abraham Lincoln and Northern Democrats (plus a few anti-Confederate Southerners such as Andrew Johnson) during and after the Civil War. Thus, for a brief period in American history, the Republican Party ceased to exist.

Today, there are other Parties, but most Americans (the less than 30% that actually vote) dismiss them as impossible to get into office, and keep voting for the same losers expecting things to change. You can always find some lady who declares, "Don't worry! We will vote the other guys in and things will get better!" regardless of the fact that this has historically never, ever panned out.

Why people can't look back with 20/20 and realize this mistake is costing us, and dearly, one has to wonder, and many Americans have simply stopped caring, doomed to be simply taken over by some faciest who will find that legal way to negate our precious constitution.

One thing is for certain: Arguing "talking points" over and over is getting us nowhere, and quickly.

Read more...

About This Blog

Vistors

Lorem Ipsum

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP